Evaluation of a Thin-bonded Portland Cement Concrete Pavement Overlay

Report No: 97-R9

Published in 1996

About the report:

This report discusses the performance of the Virginia Department of Transportation's first modern rehabilitation project involving a thin-bonded portland cement concrete overlay of an existing jointed concrete pavement. The performance of the rigid overlay, which was constructed in a fast-track mode to minimize lane closure time, was evaluated by detailed condition surveys conducted annually throughout a 6-year analysis period to identify, document, and monitor the occurrence of distress. The roughness of the overlay was also measured annually with an accelerometer-based inertial road profiler to permit an examination of the effects of surface deterioration on ride quality. After 6 full years of service, which included only minimal maintenance, the pavement overlay remained in good overall condition. Although the ride quality of the overlay remained virtually unchanged throughout the period, a significant increase in the occurrence of low-to-moderate-severity joint spalls, corner breaks, and to a lesser extent transverse cracks was noted during the fifth and sixth years. The extrusion of compression seals and the subsequent infiltration of water into the pavement structure probably contributed to the observed localized failure of the overlay/substrate bond in the vicinity of joints. This condition, in turn, weakened the pavement's structural capacity at panel edges and thereby resulted in the formation of corner breaks and cracks parallel with and near transverse joints. The consideration of thin-bonded concrete overlays constructed in a fast-track mode is recommended as a viable rehabilitation alternative for jointed concrete pavements that are not severely distressed. However, careful attention to joint installation and, in particular, joint maintenance is recommended for similar future rehabilitation projects.

Disclaimer Statement:The contents of this report reflect the views of the author(s), who is responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Virginia Department of Transportation, the Commonwealth Transportation Board, or the Federal Highway Administration. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. Any inclusion of manufacturer names, trade names, or trademarks is for identification purposes only and is not to be considered an endorsement.

Authors

Other Authors

 Thomas E. Freeman

Last updated: December 16, 2023

Alert Icon

Please note that this file is not ADA compliant. Choose one of below options: