Resistance to Chloride Ion Penetration of Concretes Containing Fly Ash, Silica Fume, or Slag

Report No: 88-R11

Published in 1988

About the report:

The effects of two pozzolanic admixtures, fly ash and silica fume, and a ground-granulated blast furnace slag on the chloride ion intrusion of concretes prepared with low water-to-cementitious material ratios (w/c) (0.35 to 0.45) were investigated. Each of these supplemental cementitious materials was used with a Type I and Type II cement. A Type III cement was also used to determine possible differences in behavior between this cement and Type II when cured at a range of temperature from 40°F to 100°F. The resistance of these concretes to chloride ion penetration was determined using the rapid permeability test (AASHTO T 277) and the 90-day ponding test similar to AASHTO T 259. Results of the rapid permeability test show that the resistance of concrete to the penetration of chloride ions increases significantly as the w/c is decreased for the same proportion of solid ingredients. Usually, concretes with pozzolans or slag exhibited higher resistance to chloride ion penetration than the control concretes containing portland cement as the cementitious material. Results of the 90-day ponding test, which was conducted with 0.40 w/c concretes only, indicated minimal chloride content at depths below 3/4 in (19 ram) for all the test concretes. A precise correlation of the rapid test for chloride permeability (AASHTO T 277) and the 90-day ponding test with salt solution was not attained, but a general relationship was shown. Strength values for all concretes made with the pozzolans and slag at 90 days were in excess of 5,000 psi (34.5 MPa), which is satisfactory. For the same type and amount .of supplemental cementitious material, strength increased as the resistance to chloride ion penetration increased; but when concretes made with different materials were compared, there was no specific relationship between strength and the results of the rapid test for resistance to chloride ion penetration.

Disclaimer Statement:The contents of this report reflect the views of the author(s), who is responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Virginia Department of Transportation, the Commonwealth Transportation Board, or the Federal Highway Administration. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. Any inclusion of manufacturer names, trade names, or trademarks is for identification purposes only and is not to be considered an endorsement.

Authors

Last updated: December 29, 2023

Alert Icon

Please note that this file is not ADA compliant. Choose one of below options: